![]() ![]() Otherwise it's not finding what I created - a section of green text - but rather deciding, by itself, that there are hundreds of bits of green text there in each one, one after another.Ĭan this behavior be changed? If not, I view it as a bug. So to be useful, the Find Color Groups is going to need to just show me 3 groups in the Results List, IMO. This seems silly, because I created those 3 green sections by shift-clicking and selecting the whole passage at once, for each one. When I click on the yellow-highlights in the list, what happens is the selection just moves along through different chunks of the green text - a clause or two at a time sometimes more, somtimes less. To clarify: using the "Find Color Groups Macro" on a document that has only two red sections (both only a few words) and three green sections (each several thousand words long), the Results List is showing me hundreds of green instances in the list. ![]() It's that the Results List chops the text up as if there are hundreds of different instances, even where the colour is contiguous (continuous). docs to be Microsoft compatible, and exports them as. It saves files in Rich Text Format, but can also save them as. That's potentially useful, but I'm having a problem with it in the Results List, which I ran into a few weeks ago also in some other search. It has all the things you’d want a word processing app to have including a dictionary and thesaurus and all the formatting bells and whistles. Here's another solution for you: a Find Color Groups macro that shows a list of all non-black text in your document, grouped by similar colors. Should work? -I'll go and try this on a Duplicate file for testing.īut if there is a more direct way I'd like to know about it also. Then I should be able to use the Find dialog box to select each instance of the file, one after another. Apply a style to them all, just for this purpose, with a special name (ie, "Normal - Blue")ģ. Select all the blue with that "Select By Attributes" macro.Ģ. ![]() Is there a way to do this that I've overlooked?Īs I'm writing this it occurs to me that I might try:ġ. There's a macro "Select By Attributes" that will allow me to find and select all of them. Find Next would do this if it had been a style but it's not, it's just an attribute. To clarify: I have text that has a certain colour applied, a shade of blue, here and there in a long book, and I have a reason for examining them one after another. I've tried the macros, the Find dialog, and the manual, and AFAIK it's not possible to do a "Find Next" search by attribute. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |